
Solar investment tax credit extended at 26% for two additional years (USA)
The President of United States has passed the federal spending package and all solar aspects are still intact.
Extended renewable energy tax credits have been included in a $1.4 trillion federal spending package alongside a $900 billion COVID-19 virus relief spending bill. The solar investment tax credit (ITC), which was scheduled to drop from 26% to 22% in 2021, will stay at 26% for two more years. The wind industry also received a limited extension of its production tax credit.
This means that solar projects in all market segments — residential, commercial, industrial, utility-scale — that begin construction in 2021 and 2022 will still be able to receive a tax credit at 26%. All markets will drop to a 22% tax credit in 2023, and the residential market will drop to 0% while the commercial and utility markets will sit at a permanent 10% credit beginning in 2024.
An extension of the ITC has seen support from many outside the industry, including congressional leaders and a group of bipartisan mayors. Various bills have been introduced in the last few years attempting to extend the solar ITC, but nothing has stuck. While there have been attempts to get an investment credit for energy storage installations, nothing involving batteries was included in this spending package.


“We are heartened to see Congress step up to provide Americans with some relief after our country has been mired in a public health and economic disaster,” said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of SEIA. “This pandemic has taken an immeasurable toll on American families, and our deepest sympathies are with those who have lost loved ones and those who are suffering economically because of the ongoing crisis. Over the next few years, we have an opportunity to build a stronger, more reliable, and more equitable American energy economy, and the action Congress is taking today is a helpful down payment.”
Some energy storage language was included in the spending and relief package. The Better Energy Storage Technology (BEST) Act authorizes $1 billion over five years for federal investments into energy storage R&D.
Comments from Energy Storage Association CEO Kelly Speakes-Backman:
“In addition to elevating energy storage as a top, cross-functional R&D priority of U.S. Department of Energy, the BEST Act establishes a new competitive grant program for states, utilities and private companies to deploy energy storage in a variety of applications. This demonstration program advances storage technology innovation and grid operations and sets the foundation for future storage deployments to protect our electric infrastructure against disruption as it enables a zero-carbon energy supply mix. We look forward to working with DOE and Congress to ensure this important program is fully funded and operates effectively.
“The inclusion of the Better Energy Storage Technology (BEST) Act as part of the year-end spending and relief package is further proof of the bipartisan, bicameral support for energy storage to improve grid reliability and flexibility.”
Categories
Recent Posts
- SolarEdge Games for UK Solar Installers March 2, 2021
- Could solar power and battery storage help solve the USA` winter grid needs? February 18, 2021
- Tesla Solar Roof 2021 Review: Pros & Cons February 10, 2021
- SolarEdge – Fully Integrated Optimized Solar PV! February 8, 2021
- Fox LV5200 Low-Voltage Battery IN STOCK January 30, 2021
- IN STOCK – The Upgraded Third Generation Pylontech Battery January 12, 2021
Archives
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (2)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (8)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (5)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (5)
- January 2020 (6)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (4)
- June 2019 (5)
- May 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (7)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (6)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (10)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (8)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (8)
- December 2017 (10)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (13)
- September 2017 (16)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (15)
- April 2017 (14)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (11)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (5)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (7)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (20)
- April 2016 (17)
- March 2016 (12)
- February 2016 (12)
- January 2016 (12)
- December 2015 (13)
- November 2015 (17)
- October 2015 (17)
- November 2014 (6)
Leave a reply